From: rars-d-request@lysator.liu.se Subject: rars-d Digest V97 #6 X-Loop: rars-d@lysator.liu.se X-Mailing-List: archive/volume97/6 Precedence: list MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/digest; boundary="----------------------------" To: rars-d@lysator.liu.se Reply-To: rars@lysator.liu.se (Rars mailing-list) ------------------------------ Content-Type: text/plain rars-d Digest Volume 97 : Issue 6 Today's Topics: Re: Platform types ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 15 Jan 1997 09:57:57 -0500 (EST) From: rscott@NetUSA.Net (Ralph Scott) To: rars@lysator.liu.se Subject: Re: Platform types Message-Id: Content-Type: text > I can agree with these systems, and believe that most people will still > be in the Low range. Personally, I've got a 486 100Mhz 32M and a > P133 16M. Not that I particpate much, but I was developing the end all > (of course) of learning drivers. I got hung up in some serious math > though. > Anyway, I develope/run on the 486 mainly - the Pent is my wife's > business > comp (at home), and would hate to loose the ability to run well on my > 486, but I know it'll happen sooner or later. Lets do it sooner than > later! I can appreciate this. I think even those not in the US might not be even ABLE to get the top range stuff. Is the last sentence the way you wanted it to turn out? ---ralph -------------------------------- End of rars-d Digest V97 Issue #6 *********************************